Champaign, IL vs Aurora, IL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Aurora, IL and Champaign, IL spend within 0.8% of each other per resident — $15,301 versus $15,173 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Aurora, IL holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 87/100 (grade A) against 55/100 (grade C) for Champaign, IL — a 32-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Champaign, IL reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Aurora, IL carries $489 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Champaign, IL leads with police at $1,426 per resident, while Aurora, IL leads with parks and recreation at $494.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 276% of total revenue in Champaign, IL and 5% in Aurora, IL.
Summary
Aurora spends 0.8% more per capita than Champaign ($129/person difference). Aurora, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 87/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $0 | $114 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $144 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,573 | $2,481 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,224 |
| Other | $1,152 | $1,114 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,426 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $488 | $216 |
| Highways & Roads | $231 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $465 | $922 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $257 |
| Parks & Recreation | $0 | $494 |
| Housing | $895 | $4,836 |
| Utilities | $5 | $2,366 |
| Other | $11,663 | $6,210 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.