Champaign, IL vs Aurora, IL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Aurora spends 0.8% more per capita than Champaign ($129/person difference). Aurora, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 87/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $0 | $114 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $144 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,573 | $2,481 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,224 |
| Other | $1,152 | $1,114 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,426 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $488 | $216 |
| Highways & Roads | $231 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $465 | $922 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $257 |
| Parks & Recreation | $0 | $494 |
| Housing | $895 | $4,836 |
| Utilities | $5 | $2,366 |
| Other | $11,663 | $6,210 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.