Centennial, CO vs Pueblo, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Pueblo, CO outspends Centennial, CO by a wide margin per resident — $16,547 versus $54, a 30616% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Centennial, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 53/100 (grade C) for Pueblo, CO — a 27-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Centennial, CO leads with parks and recreation at $54 per resident, while Pueblo, CO leads with fire protection at $283.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Centennial, CO and 126% in Pueblo, CO.
Summary
Pueblo spends 99.7% more per capita than Centennial ($16,493/person difference). Centennial, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $42 |
| Sales Tax | $0 | $115 |
| Intergovernmental | $243 | $11,588 |
| Other | $0 | $1,069 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $12 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $283 |
| Public Welfare | $0 | $694 |
| Parks & Recreation | $54 | $88 |
| Housing | $0 | $3,814 |
| Utilities | $0 | $3,526 |
| Other | $0 | $8,130 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.