Centennial, CO vs Aurora, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Aurora, CO outspends Centennial, CO by a wide margin per resident — $17,400 versus $54, a 32199% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Centennial, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 66/100 (grade B) for Aurora, CO — a 14-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Centennial, CO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Aurora, CO carries $4,017 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Centennial, CO at $54 per resident and in Aurora, CO at $1,299.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Centennial, CO at 100% of total revenue, whereas Aurora, CO relies most on charges and fees at 17%.
Summary
Aurora spends 99.7% more per capita than Centennial ($17,346/person difference). Centennial, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $0 | $303 |
| Intergovernmental | $243 | $825 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,728 |
| Other | $0 | $2,042 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $785 |
| Public Welfare | $0 | $1,001 |
| Health | $0 | $185 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $678 |
| Parks & Recreation | $54 | $1,299 |
| Housing | $0 | $3,493 |
| Utilities | $0 | $1,978 |
| Other | $0 | $7,981 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.