Cambridge, MA vs Worcester, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Cambridge spends 210.9% more per capita than Worcester ($88,688/person difference). Worcester, MA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 58/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,121 | $457 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $231 |
| Intergovernmental | $7,117 | $4,140 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,585 | $1,465 |
| Other | $6,370 | $3,233 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $672 | $186 |
| Highways & Roads | $467 | $163 |
| Education | $25,601 | $28,887 |
| Public Welfare | $737 | $889 |
| Health | $998 | $349 |
| Hospitals | $508 | $534 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,179 | $461 |
| Housing | $4,715 | $2,901 |
| Sewerage | $1,718 | $209 |
| Utilities | $2,291 | $1,046 |
| General Admin | $76,486 | $0 |
| Other | $14,364 | $6,424 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.