Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Boston, MA vs Oklahoma City, OK

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Boston spends 300.0% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($54,225/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Boston, MA
Pop. 665,945
C
56/100
Budget Balance25
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Oklahoma City, OK
Pop. 681,088
B
65/100
Budget Balance80
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency97
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Boston
Oklahoma City
Total Spending
$48.1B
$12.3B
Spending / Capita
$72,299
$18,074
Total Revenue
$20.8B
$23.9B
Revenue / Capita
$31,243
$35,156
Total Debt
$296.3M
$2.4B
Debt / Capita
$445
$3,520
Population
665,945
681,088
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Boston$1,107
Oklahoma City$513
Highways & Roads
Boston$594
Oklahoma City$0
Parks & Recreation
Boston$711
Oklahoma City$2,014
Education
Boston$30,742
Oklahoma City$0
Health
Boston$725
Oklahoma City$5

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BostonOklahoma City
Sales Tax
$78
$763
Income Tax
$0
$1,037
Intergovernmental
$5,357
$6,852
Charges & Fees
$2,784
$3,256
Other
$4,557
$1,836

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BostonOklahoma City
Fire Protection
$1,107
$513
Highways & Roads
$594
$0
Education
$30,742
$0
Public Welfare
$1,110
$1,525
Health
$725
$5
Hospitals
$2,584
$2,044
Parks & Recreation
$711
$2,014
Housing
$6,614
$2,857
Sewerage
$355
$0
Utilities
$3,402
$4,523
Interest on Debt
$0
$707
General Admin
$5,401
$0
Other
$18,955
$3,886
C
Boston, MA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
B
Oklahoma City, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health

Compare More Cities