Boston, MA vs Arlington, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Boston, MA outspends Arlington, TX by a wide margin per resident — $72,299 versus $11,769, a 514% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Arlington, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 83/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Boston, MA — a 27-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Boston, MA carries the lighter load at $445 per resident versus $594 for Arlington, TX. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Boston, MA leads with education at $30,742 per resident, while Arlington, TX leads with parks and recreation at $1,352.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 17% of total revenue in Boston, MA and 41% in Arlington, TX.
Summary
Boston spends 514.3% more per capita than Arlington ($60,529/person difference). Arlington, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 83/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $78 | $507 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $73 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,357 | $25,062 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,784 | $2,949 |
| Other | $4,557 | $3,897 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,107 | $160 |
| Highways & Roads | $594 | $149 |
| Education | $30,742 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,110 | $826 |
| Health | $725 | $219 |
| Hospitals | $2,584 | $152 |
| Parks & Recreation | $711 | $1,352 |
| Housing | $6,614 | $2,981 |
| Sewerage | $355 | $141 |
| Utilities | $3,402 | $1,385 |
| General Admin | $5,401 | $0 |
| Other | $18,955 | $4,404 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.