Blue Springs, MO vs St. Charles, MO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
St. Charles, MO outspends Blue Springs, MO by a wide margin per resident — $20,461 versus $8,040, a 154% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Blue Springs, MO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 53/100 (grade C) for St. Charles, MO — a 27-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
St. Charles, MO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Blue Springs, MO carries $40 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Blue Springs, MO leads with parks and recreation at $1,041 per resident, while St. Charles, MO leads with police at $2,304.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Blue Springs, MO and 100% in St. Charles, MO.
Summary
St. Charles spends 60.7% more per capita than Blue Springs ($12,421/person difference). Blue Springs, MO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $472 | $1,291 |
| Intergovernmental | $16,987 | $6,270 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,766 | $0 |
| Other | $2,377 | $2,994 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $2,304 |
| Fire Protection | $107 | $1,251 |
| Highways & Roads | $148 | $614 |
| Public Welfare | $740 | $4,187 |
| Hospitals | $160 | $1,602 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,041 | $1,210 |
| Housing | $3,154 | $5,745 |
| Sewerage | $153 | $197 |
| Utilities | $1,593 | $254 |
| Other | $945 | $3,097 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.