Blue Springs, MO vs Kansas City, MO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Kansas City, MO outspends Blue Springs, MO by a wide margin per resident — $22,820 versus $8,040, a 184% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Blue Springs, MO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 52/100 (grade C) for Kansas City, MO — a 28-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Kansas City, MO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Blue Springs, MO carries $40 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Blue Springs, MO at $1,041 per resident and in Kansas City, MO at $1,309.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Blue Springs, MO at 100% of total revenue, whereas Kansas City, MO relies most on other revenue at 835%.
Summary
Kansas City spends 64.8% more per capita than Blue Springs ($14,779/person difference). Blue Springs, MO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $472 | $623 |
| Intergovernmental | $16,987 | $7 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,766 | $3,794 |
| Other | $2,377 | $11,150 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $107 | $119 |
| Highways & Roads | $148 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $740 | $3,018 |
| Hospitals | $160 | $1,849 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,041 | $1,309 |
| Housing | $3,154 | $4,681 |
| Sewerage | $153 | $0 |
| Utilities | $1,593 | $3,123 |
| Other | $945 | $8,721 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.