Bloomington, IN vs Fishers, IN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Bloomington spends 125.0% more per capita than Fishers ($8,628/person difference). Fishers, IN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 84/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $364 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $885 | $101 |
| Income Tax | $227 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,245 | $23,257 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,522 | $0 |
| Other | $3,643 | $2,313 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $183 | $330 |
| Highways & Roads | $116 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $759 | $534 |
| Hospitals | $362 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,294 | $655 |
| Housing | $1,661 | $1,613 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $169 |
| Utilities | $1,857 | $0 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,179 | $0 |
| Other | $8,118 | $3,599 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.