Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Birmingham, AL vs Dothan, AL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Birmingham spends 79.9% more per capita than Dothan ($13,674/person difference). Dothan, AL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Birmingham, AL
Pop. 200,431
C
55/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Dothan, AL
Pop. 70,699
B
68/100
Budget Balance31
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency69
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Birmingham
Dothan
Total Spending
$6.2B
$1.2B
Spending / Capita
$30,790
$17,116
Total Revenue
$16.0B
$905.6M
Revenue / Capita
$79,635
$12,809
Total Debt
$565.8M
$0
Debt / Capita
$2,823
$0
Population
200,431
70,699
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Birmingham$22
Dothan$290
Fire Protection
Birmingham$1,152
Dothan$632
Highways & Roads
Birmingham$848
Dothan$290
Parks & Recreation
Birmingham$1,823
Dothan$4,666
Health
Birmingham$683
Dothan$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BirminghamDothan
Property Tax
$44
$0
Sales Tax
$281
$671
Income Tax
$0
$756
Intergovernmental
$468
$919
Charges & Fees
$10,460
$1,664
Other
$734
$3,341

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BirminghamDothan
Police
$22
$290
Fire Protection
$1,152
$632
Highways & Roads
$848
$290
Public Welfare
$2,110
$1,177
Health
$683
$0
Hospitals
$1,505
$126
Parks & Recreation
$1,823
$4,666
Housing
$5,487
$3,247
Sewerage
$594
$309
Utilities
$5,451
$2,759
Other
$11,115
$3,622
C
Birmingham, AL
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health
B
Dothan, AL
Fiscal Health Score: 68/100
Good fiscal health

Compare More Cities