Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Billings, MT vs Great Falls, MT

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Billings spends 44.4% more per capita than Great Falls ($3,844/person difference). Billings, MT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Billings, MT
Pop. 117,093
B
67/100
Budget Balance78
Debt Burden11
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Great Falls, MT
Pop. 60,373
C
54/100
Budget Balance74
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Billings
Great Falls
Total Spending
$1.5B
$522.6M
Spending / Capita
$12,501
$8,656
Total Revenue
$1.8B
$652.9M
Revenue / Capita
$15,768
$10,814
Total Debt
$135.6M
$90.0M
Debt / Capita
$1,158
$1,490
Population
117,093
60,373
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Billings$145
Great Falls$251
Parks & Recreation
Billings$883
Great Falls$1,064
Health
Billings$330
Great Falls$229

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BillingsGreat Falls
Property Tax
$787
$48
Sales Tax
$251
$595
Income Tax
$1,706
$882
Intergovernmental
$1,539
$10,814
Charges & Fees
$2,714
$2,342
Other
$2,720
$2,571

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BillingsGreat Falls
Fire Protection
$145
$251
Public Welfare
$1,929
$755
Health
$330
$229
Hospitals
$105
$525
Parks & Recreation
$883
$1,064
Housing
$2,463
$1,988
Sewerage
$195
$0
Utilities
$2,914
$1,755
Interest on Debt
$535
$0
Other
$3,002
$2,089
B
Billings, MT
Fiscal Health Score: 67/100
Good fiscal health
C
Great Falls, MT
Fiscal Health Score: 54/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities