Bellevue, WA vs Tacoma, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Tacoma spends 7.7% more per capita than Bellevue ($1,830/person difference). Tacoma, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,441 | $131 |
| Sales Tax | $1,282 | $789 |
| Income Tax | $50 | $3,984 |
| Intergovernmental | $8,407 | $17,186 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,003 | $5,236 |
| Other | $8,143 | $6,696 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $162 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $966 | $1,153 |
| Highways & Roads | $80 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,396 |
| Public Welfare | $1,774 | $1,807 |
| Health | $0 | $283 |
| Hospitals | $2,517 | $396 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,103 | $1,048 |
| Housing | $3,270 | $4,805 |
| Sewerage | $199 | $798 |
| Utilities | $3,441 | $5,418 |
| Other | $6,553 | $6,793 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.