Beaverton, OR vs Springfield, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Springfield, OR and Beaverton, OR spend within 5.8% of each other per resident — $12,624 versus $11,934 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Springfield, OR edges Beaverton, OR on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 55/100 (grade C) to 50/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Springfield, OR carries the lighter load at $23 per resident versus $2,344 for Beaverton, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Beaverton, OR leads with health at $994 per resident, while Springfield, OR leads with fire protection at $393.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Beaverton, OR at 100% of total revenue, whereas Springfield, OR relies most on other revenue at 194%.
Summary
Springfield spends 5.5% more per capita than Beaverton ($689/person difference). Springfield, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 55/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $25 | $44 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,094 | $364 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,390 | $2,497 |
| Other | $1,691 | $13,347 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $268 | $393 |
| Public Welfare | $967 | $1,098 |
| Health | $994 | $375 |
| Hospitals | $455 | $181 |
| Housing | $3,728 | $3,952 |
| Sewerage | $406 | $236 |
| Utilities | $1,470 | $1,394 |
| Other | $3,645 | $4,994 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.