Baton Rouge, LA vs Lake Charles, LA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Baton Rouge, LA outspends Lake Charles, LA by a wide margin per resident — $43,886 versus $12,552, a 250% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Baton Rouge, LA edges Lake Charles, LA on the Fiscal Health Score by 2 points — 75/100 (grade B) to 73/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Baton Rouge, LA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Lake Charles, LA carries $4 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Baton Rouge, LA leads with health at $2,058 per resident, while Lake Charles, LA leads with parks and recreation at $737.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Baton Rouge, LA at 9% of total revenue, whereas Lake Charles, LA relies most on charges and fees at 27%.
Summary
Baton Rouge spends 249.6% more per capita than Lake Charles ($31,334/person difference). Baton Rouge, LA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 75/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $488 | $38 |
| Income Tax | $2,296 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $949 | $10 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $1,751 |
| Other | $7,610 | $1,431 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,820 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,140 | $240 |
| Highways & Roads | $589 | $204 |
| Public Welfare | $2,691 | $543 |
| Health | $2,058 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $4,729 | $1,466 |
| Parks & Recreation | $758 | $737 |
| Housing | $7,045 | $2,714 |
| Sewerage | $236 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,413 | $1,918 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,735 | $435 |
| General Admin | $4,492 | $0 |
| Other | $14,181 | $4,296 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.