Baltimore, MD vs Los Angeles, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Los Angeles, CA spends 26% more per resident than Baltimore, MD: $85,432 against $67,935. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Baltimore, MD holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 70/100 (grade B) against 47/100 (grade D) for Los Angeles, CA — a 23-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Baltimore, MD leads with education at $35,510 per resident, while Los Angeles, CA leads with police at $4,111.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Baltimore, MD at 7% of total revenue, whereas Los Angeles, CA relies most on other revenue at 51%.
Summary
Los Angeles spends 20.5% more per capita than Baltimore ($17,498/person difference). Baltimore, MD has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $84 | $64 |
| Sales Tax | $55 | $77 |
| Income Tax | $375 | $307 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,085 | $134 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,192 | $459 |
| Other | $4,765 | $9,048 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $820 | $4,111 |
| Fire Protection | $1,214 | $1,057 |
| Highways & Roads | $676 | $503 |
| Education | $35,510 | $829 |
| Public Welfare | $714 | $1,286 |
| Health | $757 | $409 |
| Hospitals | $1,877 | $2,135 |
| Parks & Recreation | $384 | $1,347 |
| Housing | $4,087 | $6,325 |
| Sewerage | $87 | $34 |
| Utilities | $3,809 | $21,992 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $630 |
| General Admin | $19 | $11,586 |
| Other | $17,981 | $33,189 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.