Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Bakersfield, CA vs Tucson, AZ

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Tucson spends 26.5% more per capita than Bakersfield ($4,183/person difference). Bakersfield, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Tucson, AZ
Pop. 541,033
C
55/100
Budget Balance71
Debt Burden10
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Bakersfield
Tucson
Total Spending
$4.7B
$8.5B
Spending / Capita
$11,576
$15,759
Total Revenue
$1.6B
$12.6B
Revenue / Capita
$3,862
$23,276
Total Debt
$0
$833.1M
Debt / Capita
$0
$1,540
Population
404,321
541,033
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Bakersfield$0
Tucson$330
Parks & Recreation
Bakersfield$741
Tucson$1,229

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BakersfieldTucson
Property Tax
$1
$5
Sales Tax
$20
$309
Income Tax
$1,909
$1,107
Intergovernmental
$3,862
$23,276
Charges & Fees
$1,024
$4,534
Other
$1,915
$952

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BakersfieldTucson
Fire Protection
$0
$330
Public Welfare
$840
$1,181
Hospitals
$425
$1,314
Parks & Recreation
$741
$1,229
Housing
$3,391
$3,091
Sewerage
$265
$0
Utilities
$2,679
$3,555
Interest on Debt
$0
$1,735
Other
$3,234
$3,322
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
C
Tucson, AZ
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities