Bakersfield, CA vs San Francisco, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Francisco spends 93.7% more per capita than Bakersfield ($172,555/person difference). Bakersfield, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
D
48/100
Budget Balance70
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Bakersfield
San Francisco
Total Spending
$4.7B
$156.7B
Spending / Capita
$11,576
$184,131
Total Revenue
$1.6B
$232.3B
Revenue / Capita
$3,862
$272,907
Total Debt
$0
$1.7B
Debt / Capita
$0
$2,031
Population
404,321
851,036
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Bakersfield$0
San Francisco$3,351
Fire Protection
Bakersfield$0
San Francisco$2,281
Parks & Recreation
Bakersfield$741
San Francisco$4,119
Health
Bakersfield$0
San Francisco$1,911
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
BakersfieldSan Francisco
| Property Tax | $1 | $148 |
| Sales Tax | $20 | $3,028 |
| Income Tax | $1,909 | $269 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,862 | $19,762 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,024 | $7,961 |
| Other | $1,915 | $18,918 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
BakersfieldSan Francisco
| Police | $0 | $3,351 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $2,281 |
| Public Welfare | $840 | $2,203 |
| Health | $0 | $1,911 |
| Hospitals | $425 | $6,939 |
| Parks & Recreation | $741 | $4,119 |
| Housing | $3,391 | $9,315 |
| Sewerage | $265 | $1,423 |
| Utilities | $2,679 | $21,190 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $22,798 |
| General Admin | $0 | $14,899 |
| Other | $3,234 | $93,702 |
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
D
San Francisco, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 48/100
Below average fiscal health