Bakersfield, CA vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Bakersfield spends 3.5% more per capita than Omaha ($396/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Bakersfield
Omaha
Total Spending
$4.7B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$11,576
$11,180
Total Revenue
$1.6B
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$3,862
$26,929
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
404,321
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Highways & Roads
Bakersfield$0
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Bakersfield$741
Omaha$742
Health
Bakersfield$0
Omaha$456
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
BakersfieldOmaha
| Property Tax | $1 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $20 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $1,909 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,862 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,024 | $0 |
| Other | $1,915 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
BakersfieldOmaha
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $840 | $1,521 |
| Health | $0 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $425 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $741 | $742 |
| Housing | $3,391 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $265 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,679 | $581 |
| Other | $3,234 | $4,516 |
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health