Austin, TX vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Austin, TX outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $21,772 versus $5,250, a 315% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Austin, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 75/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 19-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Austin, TX carries $1,229 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Austin, TX leads with parks and recreation at $1,801 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Austin spends 314.7% more per capita than Tulsa ($16,522/person difference). Austin, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 75/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $526 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $1,465 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,031 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,247 | $0 |
| Other | $5,645 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $634 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $257 |
| Education | $51 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,837 | $86 |
| Health | $517 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $664 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,801 | $154 |
| Housing | $3,741 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $865 | $27 |
| Utilities | $3,264 | $41 |
| Other | $8,399 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.