Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Austin, TX vs Tulsa, OK

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Austin spends 314.7% more per capita than Tulsa ($16,522/person difference). Austin, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 75/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Austin, TX
Pop. 958,202
B
75/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden38
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency80
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Tulsa, OK
Pop. 411,938
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Austin
Tulsa
Total Spending
$20.9B
$2.2B
Spending / Capita
$21,772
$5,250
Total Revenue
$74.4B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$77,600
$0
Total Debt
$1.2B
$0
Debt / Capita
$1,229
$0
Population
958,202
411,938
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Austin$0
Tulsa$628
Fire Protection
Austin$634
Tulsa$196
Highways & Roads
Austin$0
Tulsa$257
Parks & Recreation
Austin$1,801
Tulsa$154
Education
Austin$51
Tulsa$0
Health
Austin$517
Tulsa$762

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

AustinTulsa
Sales Tax
$526
$97
Income Tax
$1,465
$0
Intergovernmental
$14,031
$0
Charges & Fees
$3,247
$0
Other
$5,645
$53

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

AustinTulsa
Police
$0
$628
Fire Protection
$634
$196
Highways & Roads
$0
$257
Education
$51
$0
Public Welfare
$1,837
$86
Health
$517
$762
Hospitals
$664
$0
Parks & Recreation
$1,801
$154
Housing
$3,741
$350
Sewerage
$865
$27
Utilities
$3,264
$41
Other
$8,399
$2,748
B
Austin, TX
Fiscal Health Score: 75/100
Good fiscal health
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities