Austin, TX vs San Jose, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Austin, TX spends 21% more per resident than San Jose, CA: $21,772 against $17,934. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 75/100 (grade B) for Austin, TX — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Austin, TX carries $1,229 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Austin, TX at $1,801 per resident and in San Jose, CA at $1,424.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Austin, TX at 18% of total revenue, whereas San Jose, CA relies most on other revenue at 9%.
Summary
Austin spends 21.4% more per capita than San Jose ($3,838/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $40 |
| Sales Tax | $526 | $315 |
| Income Tax | $1,465 | $1,935 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,031 | $2,680 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,247 | $608 |
| Other | $5,645 | $3,519 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $634 | $0 |
| Education | $51 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,837 | $810 |
| Health | $517 | $609 |
| Hospitals | $664 | $1,254 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,801 | $1,424 |
| Housing | $3,741 | $4,897 |
| Sewerage | $865 | $161 |
| Utilities | $3,264 | $2,533 |
| Other | $8,399 | $6,247 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.