Austin, TX vs Philadelphia, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Philadelphia, PA outspends Austin, TX by a wide margin per resident — $56,272 versus $21,772, a 158% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Austin, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 75/100 (grade B) against 45/100 (grade D) for Philadelphia, PA — a 30-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Philadelphia, PA carries the lighter load at $1,069 per resident versus $1,229 for Austin, TX. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Austin, TX leads with parks and recreation at $1,801 per resident, while Philadelphia, PA leads with fire protection at $7,082.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 18% of total revenue in Austin, TX and 16% in Philadelphia, PA.
Summary
Philadelphia spends 61.3% more per capita than Austin ($34,500/person difference). Austin, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 75/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $526 | $107 |
| Income Tax | $1,465 | $8 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,031 | $6,288 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,247 | $2,790 |
| Other | $5,645 | $4,029 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $1,505 |
| Fire Protection | $634 | $7,082 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $1,215 |
| Education | $51 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,837 | $1,456 |
| Health | $517 | $229 |
| Hospitals | $664 | $4,048 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,801 | $593 |
| Housing | $3,741 | $4,902 |
| Sewerage | $865 | $325 |
| Utilities | $3,264 | $4,222 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $3 |
| Other | $8,399 | $30,692 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.