Austin, TX vs Oklahoma City, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Austin, TX spends 20% more per resident than Oklahoma City, OK: $21,772 against $18,074. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Austin, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 75/100 (grade B) against 65/100 (grade B) for Oklahoma City, OK — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Austin, TX carries the lighter load at $1,229 per resident versus $3,520 for Oklahoma City, OK. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Austin, TX at $1,801 per resident and in Oklahoma City, OK at $2,014.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 18% of total revenue in Austin, TX and 19% in Oklahoma City, OK.
Summary
Austin spends 20.5% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($3,698/person difference). Austin, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 75/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $526 | $763 |
| Income Tax | $1,465 | $1,037 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,031 | $6,852 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,247 | $3,256 |
| Other | $5,645 | $1,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $634 | $513 |
| Education | $51 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,837 | $1,525 |
| Health | $517 | $5 |
| Hospitals | $664 | $2,044 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,801 | $2,014 |
| Housing | $3,741 | $2,857 |
| Sewerage | $865 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,264 | $4,523 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $707 |
| Other | $8,399 | $3,886 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.