Austin, TX vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN and Austin, TX spend within 0.6% of each other per resident — $21,910 versus $21,772 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Austin, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 75/100 (grade B) against 65/100 (grade B) for Minneapolis, MN — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $1,229 for Austin, TX. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Austin, TX at $1,801 per resident and in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Austin, TX at 18% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 0.6% more per capita than Austin ($138/person difference). Austin, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 75/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $526 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $1,465 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,031 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,247 | $2,040 |
| Other | $5,645 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $634 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Education | $51 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,837 | $1,500 |
| Health | $517 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $664 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,801 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $3,741 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $865 | $570 |
| Utilities | $3,264 | $2,398 |
| Other | $8,399 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.