Austin, TX vs Lubbock, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Lubbock, TX spends 50% more per resident than Austin, TX: $32,743 against $21,772. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Austin, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 75/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Lubbock, TX — a 19-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Lubbock, TX reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Austin, TX carries $1,229 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Austin, TX leads with parks and recreation at $1,801 per resident, while Lubbock, TX leads with police at $322.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Austin, TX at 18% of total revenue, whereas Lubbock, TX relies most on other revenue at 25%.
Summary
Lubbock spends 33.5% more per capita than Austin ($10,971/person difference). Austin, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 75/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $526 | $2 |
| Income Tax | $1,465 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,031 | $76 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,247 | $0 |
| Other | $5,645 | $781 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $322 |
| Fire Protection | $634 | $173 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $296 |
| Education | $51 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,837 | $258 |
| Health | $517 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $664 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,801 | $13 |
| Housing | $3,741 | $2,128 |
| Sewerage | $865 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,264 | $45 |
| General Admin | $0 | $26,777 |
| Other | $8,399 | $2,732 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.