Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Austin, TX vs Chicago, IL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Chicago spends 37.0% more per capita than Austin ($12,779/person difference). Austin, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 75/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Austin, TX
Pop. 958,202
B
75/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden38
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency80
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Chicago, IL
Pop. 2,721,914
C
61/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden61
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Austin
Chicago
Total Spending
$20.9B
$94.0B
Spending / Capita
$21,772
$34,551
Total Revenue
$74.4B
$231.6B
Revenue / Capita
$77,600
$85,083
Total Debt
$1.2B
$2.7B
Debt / Capita
$1,229
$977
Population
958,202
2,721,914
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Austin$634
Chicago$10,754
Highways & Roads
Austin$0
Chicago$930
Parks & Recreation
Austin$1,801
Chicago$122
Education
Austin$51
Chicago$0
Health
Austin$517
Chicago$426

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

AustinChicago
Property Tax
$0
$26
Sales Tax
$526
$74
Income Tax
$1,465
$229
Intergovernmental
$14,031
$85,083
Charges & Fees
$3,247
$2,847
Other
$5,645
$3,463

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

AustinChicago
Fire Protection
$634
$10,754
Highways & Roads
$0
$930
Education
$51
$0
Public Welfare
$1,837
$1,858
Health
$517
$426
Hospitals
$664
$1,444
Parks & Recreation
$1,801
$122
Housing
$3,741
$6,520
Sewerage
$865
$129
Utilities
$3,264
$2,983
Other
$8,399
$9,385
B
Austin, TX
Fiscal Health Score: 75/100
Good fiscal health
C
Chicago, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities