Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Aurora, IL vs Springfield, IL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Springfield spends 3.0% more per capita than Aurora ($470/person difference). Aurora, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 87/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Aurora, IL
Pop. 181,405
A
87/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden91
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency89
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Springfield, IL
Pop. 114,214
B
68/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency87
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Aurora
Springfield
Total Spending
$2.8B
$1.8B
Spending / Capita
$15,301
$15,771
Total Revenue
$8.3B
$12.9B
Revenue / Capita
$45,546
$112,589
Total Debt
$88.7M
$278.8M
Debt / Capita
$489
$2,441
Population
181,405
114,214
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Aurora$216
Springfield$0
Highways & Roads
Aurora$0
Springfield$1,079
Parks & Recreation
Aurora$494
Springfield$325
Education
Aurora$0
Springfield$106
Health
Aurora$0
Springfield$388

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

AuroraSpringfield
Sales Tax
$114
$26
Income Tax
$144
$0
Intergovernmental
$2,481
$18,701
Charges & Fees
$2,224
$2,314
Other
$1,114
$1,274

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

AuroraSpringfield
Fire Protection
$216
$0
Highways & Roads
$0
$1,079
Education
$0
$106
Public Welfare
$922
$1,275
Health
$0
$388
Hospitals
$257
$0
Parks & Recreation
$494
$325
Housing
$4,836
$0
Utilities
$2,366
$1,570
Other
$6,210
$11,028
A
Aurora, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 87/100
Excellent fiscal health
B
Springfield, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 68/100
Good fiscal health

Compare More Cities