Auburn, AL vs Tuscaloosa, AL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Auburn spends 8.8% more per capita than Tuscaloosa ($961/person difference). Auburn, AL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $2 |
| Sales Tax | $22 | $0 |
| Income Tax | $713 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $15,016 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,773 | $0 |
| Other | $3,814 | $791 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $1,260 |
| Fire Protection | $551 | $1,043 |
| Public Welfare | $1,001 | $2,419 |
| Health | $328 | $540 |
| Hospitals | $1,012 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $934 | $375 |
| Housing | $2,229 | $1,916 |
| Sewerage | $182 | $0 |
| Utilities | $1,765 | $88 |
| Other | $3,853 | $3,252 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.