Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Auburn, AL vs Tuscaloosa, AL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Auburn spends 8.8% more per capita than Tuscaloosa ($961/person difference). Auburn, AL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Auburn, AL
Pop. 76,660
A
80/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Tuscaloosa, AL
Pop. 105,797
C
55/100
Budget Balance0
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Auburn
Tuscaloosa
Total Spending
$908.9M
$1.2B
Spending / Capita
$11,856
$10,894
Total Revenue
$1.2B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$15,016
$0
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
76,660
105,797
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Auburn$0
Tuscaloosa$1,260
Fire Protection
Auburn$551
Tuscaloosa$1,043
Parks & Recreation
Auburn$934
Tuscaloosa$375
Health
Auburn$328
Tuscaloosa$540

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

AuburnTuscaloosa
Property Tax
$0
$2
Sales Tax
$22
$0
Income Tax
$713
$0
Intergovernmental
$15,016
$0
Charges & Fees
$1,773
$0
Other
$3,814
$791

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

AuburnTuscaloosa
Police
$0
$1,260
Fire Protection
$551
$1,043
Public Welfare
$1,001
$2,419
Health
$328
$540
Hospitals
$1,012
$0
Parks & Recreation
$934
$375
Housing
$2,229
$1,916
Sewerage
$182
$0
Utilities
$1,765
$88
Other
$3,853
$3,252
A
Auburn, AL
Fiscal Health Score: 80/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Tuscaloosa, AL
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities