Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Auburn, AL vs Huntsville, AL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Huntsville spends 26.1% more per capita than Auburn ($4,177/person difference). Auburn, AL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Auburn, AL
Pop. 76,660
A
80/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Huntsville, AL
Pop. 215,025
C
58/100
Budget Balance62
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency85
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Auburn
Huntsville
Total Spending
$908.9M
$3.4B
Spending / Capita
$11,856
$16,033
Total Revenue
$1.2B
$9.5B
Revenue / Capita
$15,016
$44,087
Total Debt
$0
$275.0M
Debt / Capita
$0
$1,279
Population
76,660
215,025
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Auburn$551
Huntsville$637
Parks & Recreation
Auburn$934
Huntsville$1,600
Education
Auburn$0
Huntsville$60
Health
Auburn$328
Huntsville$354

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

AuburnHuntsville
Sales Tax
$22
$833
Income Tax
$713
$656
Intergovernmental
$15,016
$4,511
Charges & Fees
$1,773
$2,558
Other
$3,814
$2,647

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

AuburnHuntsville
Fire Protection
$551
$637
Education
$0
$60
Public Welfare
$1,001
$708
Health
$328
$354
Hospitals
$1,012
$692
Parks & Recreation
$934
$1,600
Housing
$2,229
$2,611
Sewerage
$182
$136
Utilities
$1,765
$2,983
Other
$3,853
$6,253
A
Auburn, AL
Fiscal Health Score: 80/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Huntsville, AL
Fiscal Health Score: 58/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities