Atlanta, GA vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Atlanta, GA outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $25,457 versus $5,250, a 385% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Atlanta, GA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 85/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 29-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Atlanta, GA leads with parks and recreation at $1,274 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Atlanta spends 384.9% more per capita than Tulsa ($20,207/person difference). Atlanta, GA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 85/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $419 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $0 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $1,292 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,121 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,645 | $0 |
| Other | $5,461 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $315 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $464 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $513 | $257 |
| Education | $25 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,587 | $86 |
| Health | $0 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $55 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,274 | $154 |
| Housing | $4,594 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $343 | $27 |
| Utilities | $8,026 | $41 |
| Other | $8,262 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.