Atlanta, GA vs Oklahoma City, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Atlanta, GA spends 41% more per resident than Oklahoma City, OK: $25,457 against $18,074. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Atlanta, GA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 85/100 (grade A) against 65/100 (grade B) for Oklahoma City, OK — a 20-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Atlanta, GA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Oklahoma City, OK carries $3,520 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Atlanta, GA at $1,274 per resident and in Oklahoma City, OK at $2,014.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 6% of total revenue in Atlanta, GA and 19% in Oklahoma City, OK.
Summary
Atlanta spends 40.9% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($7,384/person difference). Atlanta, GA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 85/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $419 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $0 | $763 |
| Income Tax | $1,292 | $1,037 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,121 | $6,852 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,645 | $3,256 |
| Other | $5,461 | $1,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $315 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $464 | $513 |
| Highways & Roads | $513 | $0 |
| Education | $25 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,587 | $1,525 |
| Health | $0 | $5 |
| Hospitals | $55 | $2,044 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,274 | $2,014 |
| Housing | $4,594 | $2,857 |
| Sewerage | $343 | $0 |
| Utilities | $8,026 | $4,523 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $707 |
| Other | $8,262 | $3,886 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.