Arlington, TX vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA outspends Arlington, TX by a wide margin per resident — $34,463 versus $11,769, a 193% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Arlington, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 83/100 (grade A) against 61/100 (grade C) for Seattle, WA — a 22-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Arlington, TX carries the lighter load at $594 per resident versus $1,100 for Seattle, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Arlington, TX at $1,352 per resident and in Seattle, WA at $3,923.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 41% of total revenue in Arlington, TX and 13% in Seattle, WA.
Summary
Seattle spends 65.8% more per capita than Arlington ($22,693/person difference). Arlington, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 83/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $507 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $73 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $25,062 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,949 | $3,960 |
| Other | $3,897 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $160 | $210 |
| Highways & Roads | $149 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $826 | $3,439 |
| Health | $219 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $152 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,352 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $2,981 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $141 | $952 |
| Utilities | $1,385 | $6,489 |
| Other | $4,404 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.