Arlington, TX vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Arlington, TX and Omaha, NE spend within 5.3% of each other per resident — $11,769 versus $11,180 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Omaha, NE edges Arlington, TX on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 90/100 (grade A) to 83/100 (grade A). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Arlington, TX carries $594 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Arlington, TX at $1,352 per resident and in Omaha, NE at $742.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Arlington, TX at 41% of total revenue, whereas Omaha, NE relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Arlington spends 5.3% more per capita than Omaha ($589/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $507 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $73 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $25,062 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,949 | $0 |
| Other | $3,897 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $160 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $149 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $826 | $1,521 |
| Health | $219 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $152 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,352 | $742 |
| Housing | $2,981 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $141 | $0 |
| Utilities | $1,385 | $581 |
| Other | $4,404 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.