Ann Arbor, MI vs Westland, MI
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Ann Arbor, MI outspends Westland, MI by a wide margin per resident — $22,006 versus $13,362, a 65% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Westland, MI holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 61/100 (grade C) against 46/100 (grade D) for Ann Arbor, MI — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Westland, MI carries the lighter load at $267 per resident versus $2,923 for Ann Arbor, MI. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Ann Arbor, MI leads with parks and recreation at $1,799 per resident, while Westland, MI leads with fire protection at $1,333.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Ann Arbor, MI at 17% of total revenue, whereas Westland, MI relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Ann Arbor spends 64.7% more per capita than Westland ($8,644/person difference). Westland, MI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $452 | $0 |
| Income Tax | $378 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,670 | $12,877 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,961 | $1,581 |
| Other | $4,076 | $3,274 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,572 | $1,333 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $145 |
| Public Welfare | $1,621 | $1,350 |
| Health | $0 | $859 |
| Hospitals | $2,532 | $136 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,799 | $555 |
| Housing | $2,662 | $2,581 |
| Sewerage | $511 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,610 | $812 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,056 | $0 |
| Other | $7,644 | $5,590 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.