Anaheim, CA vs Los Angeles, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Los Angeles, CA outspends Anaheim, CA by a wide margin per resident — $85,432 versus $23,533, a 263% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Anaheim, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 78/100 (grade B) against 47/100 (grade D) for Los Angeles, CA — a 31-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Anaheim, CA leads with parks and recreation at $2,078 per resident, while Los Angeles, CA leads with police at $4,111.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 5% of total revenue in Anaheim, CA and 51% in Los Angeles, CA.
Summary
Los Angeles spends 72.5% more per capita than Anaheim ($61,900/person difference). Anaheim, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 78/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $64 |
| Sales Tax | $1,788 | $77 |
| Income Tax | $2,380 | $307 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,297 | $134 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,764 | $459 |
| Other | $5,232 | $9,048 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $4,111 |
| Fire Protection | $254 | $1,057 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $503 |
| Education | $0 | $829 |
| Public Welfare | $813 | $1,286 |
| Health | $358 | $409 |
| Hospitals | $4,753 | $2,135 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,078 | $1,347 |
| Housing | $5,592 | $6,325 |
| Sewerage | $726 | $34 |
| Utilities | $3,943 | $21,992 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $630 |
| General Admin | $0 | $11,586 |
| Other | $5,014 | $33,189 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.