Albuquerque, NM vs Tucson, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Albuquerque, NM and Tucson, AZ spend within 9.4% of each other per resident — $17,237 versus $15,759 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Albuquerque, NM holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 81/100 (grade A) against 55/100 (grade C) for Tucson, AZ — a 26-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Albuquerque, NM carries the lighter load at $613 per resident versus $1,540 for Tucson, AZ. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Albuquerque, NM at $1,990 per resident and in Tucson, AZ at $1,229.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Albuquerque, NM at 11% of total revenue, whereas Tucson, AZ relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Albuquerque spends 9.4% more per capita than Tucson ($1,478/person difference). Albuquerque, NM has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 81/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $36 | $5 |
| Sales Tax | $355 | $309 |
| Income Tax | $1,580 | $1,107 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,897 | $23,276 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,633 | $4,534 |
| Other | $2,174 | $952 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $440 | $330 |
| Highways & Roads | $172 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $419 | $1,181 |
| Health | $291 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $328 | $1,314 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,990 | $1,229 |
| Housing | $4,080 | $3,091 |
| Utilities | $5,212 | $3,555 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,096 | $1,735 |
| Other | $3,209 | $3,322 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.