Albuquerque, NM vs Philadelphia, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Philadelphia, PA outspends Albuquerque, NM by a wide margin per resident — $56,272 versus $17,237, a 226% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Albuquerque, NM holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 81/100 (grade A) against 45/100 (grade D) for Philadelphia, PA — a 36-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Albuquerque, NM carries the lighter load at $613 per resident versus $1,069 for Philadelphia, PA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Albuquerque, NM leads with parks and recreation at $1,990 per resident, while Philadelphia, PA leads with fire protection at $7,082.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Albuquerque, NM at 11% of total revenue, whereas Philadelphia, PA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 16%.
Summary
Philadelphia spends 69.4% more per capita than Albuquerque ($39,035/person difference). Albuquerque, NM has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 81/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $36 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $355 | $107 |
| Income Tax | $1,580 | $8 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,897 | $6,288 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,633 | $2,790 |
| Other | $2,174 | $4,029 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $1,505 |
| Fire Protection | $440 | $7,082 |
| Highways & Roads | $172 | $1,215 |
| Public Welfare | $419 | $1,456 |
| Health | $291 | $229 |
| Hospitals | $328 | $4,048 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,990 | $593 |
| Housing | $4,080 | $4,902 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $325 |
| Utilities | $5,212 | $4,222 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,096 | $3 |
| Other | $3,209 | $30,692 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.