Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Sandy Springs, GA

Population: 107,221 (2022) · Mid-Size Cities (100K-250K)

A
80/100

Excellent fiscal health, strong reserves, low debt, well-funded pensions

Total Spending
$968.2M
Per Capita
$9,030
Total Revenue
$2.4B
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
37.4%$361.9M
Housing & Community Development
26.6%$257.3M
Public Welfare
13.7%$133.1M
Parks & Recreation
9.9%$96.1M
Highways & Roads
6.7%$64.9M
Fire Protection
5.7%$54.9M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Property Tax
0.1%$1.4M
Sales Tax
1.8%$42.2M
Intergovernmental
100.0%$2.4B
Other
2.6%$60.8M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection$512/person
Highways & Roads$605/person
Parks & Recreation$896/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)100/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)100/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Sandy Springs stacks up against another city.

vs Atlanta, GAvs Columbus, GAvs Augusta-Richmond County consolidated government (balance), GA
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Georgia

Frequently Asked Questions

Sandy Springs, GA spends $9,030 per resident, based on total expenditures of $968.2M for a population of 107,221. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of A (80/100).

Sandy Springs, GA has total expenditures of $968.2M and total revenue of $2.4B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Sandy Springs, GA employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Sandy Springs, GA has a Fiscal Health Score of A (80/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. cities, counties, and states. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.