Racine, WI
Population: 77,453 (2022) · Small Cities (50K-100K)
Good fiscal health, above-average across most metrics
Spending Breakdown
Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.
Revenue Sources
Per Capita Spending by Department
Score Breakdown
Compare Cities
See how Racine stacks up against another city.
vs Milwaukee, WIvs Madison, WIvs Green Bay, WIOther Cities in Wisconsin
Frequently Asked Questions
Racine, WI spends $24,108 per resident, based on total expenditures of $1.9B for a population of 77,453. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of B (70/100).
Racine, WI has total expenditures of $1.9B and total revenue of $1.7B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.
Racine, WI employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.
Racine, WI has a Fiscal Health Score of B (70/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. municipal and county government finances dataset. The detail above comes directly from the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. cities, counties, and states.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. cities, counties, and states. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.