Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Port Orange, FL

Population: 62,849 (2022) · Small Cities (50K–100K)

C
56/100

Average fiscal health — some areas of concern

Total Spending
$639.8M
Per Capita
$10,180
Total Revenue
$387.8M
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
28.9%$184.7M
Housing & Community Development
22.8%$146.2M
Fire Protection
18.1%$115.7M
Utilities
12.2%$78.3M
Parks & Recreation
9.5%$60.7M
Public Welfare
8.5%$54.2M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Property Tax
0.6%$2.5M
Sales Tax
5.9%$23.0M
Income Tax
22.7%$88.0M
Intergovernmental
100.0%$387.8M
Charges & Fees
32.7%$127.0M
Other
48.8%$189.4M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection$1,841/person
Parks & Recreation$966/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)5/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)100/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Port Orange stacks up against another city.

vs Jacksonville, FLvs Miami, FLvs Tampa, FL
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Florida

Frequently Asked Questions

Port Orange, FL spends $10,180 per resident, based on total expenditures of $639.8M for a population of 62,849. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of C (56/100).

Port Orange, FL has total expenditures of $639.8M and total revenue of $387.8M. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Port Orange, FL employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Port Orange, FL has a Fiscal Health Score of C (56/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.