Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Parker, CO

Population: 58,733 (2022) · Small Cities (50K-100K)

B
73/100

Good fiscal health, above-average across most metrics

Total Spending
$636.9M
Per Capita
$10,844
Total Revenue
$609.3M
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Parks & Recreation
28.8%$183.7M
Housing & Community Development
27.4%$174.6M
Public Welfare
21.9%$139.2M
Other
12.5%$79.5M
Sewerage
2.9%$18.4M
Fire Protection
2.8%$18.0M
Hospitals
2.8%$17.6M
Highways & Roads
0.8%$4.9M
Utilities
0.2%$1.0M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Sales Tax
13.3%$81.2M
Intergovernmental
100.0%$609.3M
Other
10.0%$60.8M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection$306/person
Highways & Roads$83/person
Parks & Recreation$3,128/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)71/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)100/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Parker stacks up against another city.

Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Colorado

Frequently Asked Questions

Parker, CO spends $10,844 per resident, based on total expenditures of $636.9M for a population of 58,733. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of B (73/100).

Parker, CO has total expenditures of $636.9M and total revenue of $609.3M. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Parker, CO employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Parker, CO has a Fiscal Health Score of B (73/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

Every number on this page links back to the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. cities, counties, and states. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.