Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Miramar, FL

Population: 135,158 (2022) · Mid-Size Cities (100K–250K)

B
72/100

Good fiscal health — above-average across most metrics

Total Spending
$2.3B
Per Capita
$16,869
Total Revenue
$2.3B
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
34.9%$796.7M
Fire Protection
22.5%$513.9M
Housing & Community Development
22.5%$513.3M
Parks & Recreation
8.5%$194.0M
Utilities
5.7%$129.3M
Sewerage
2.8%$64.2M
Hospitals
1.2%$27.0M
Public Welfare
0.9%$21.3M
Interest on Debt
0.9%$20.3M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Sales Tax
1.3%$28.6M
Intergovernmental
3.5%$80.4M
Charges & Fees
10.6%$241.3M
Other
19.7%$449.1M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection$3,802/person
Parks & Recreation$1,435/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)40/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)80/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)100/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Miramar stacks up against another city.

vs Jacksonville, FLvs Miami, FLvs Tampa, FL
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Florida

Frequently Asked Questions

Miramar, FL spends $16,869 per resident, based on total expenditures of $2.3B for a population of 135,158. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of B (72/100).

Miramar, FL has total expenditures of $2.3B and total revenue of $2.3B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Miramar, FL employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Miramar, FL has a Fiscal Health Score of B (72/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.