Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Kalamazoo, MI

Population: 73,342 (2022) · Small Cities (50K–100K)

C
50/100

Average fiscal health — some areas of concern

Total Spending
$1.8B
Per Capita
$25,034
Total Revenue
$1.0B
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
51.1%$938.9M
Public Welfare
14.1%$259.7M
Housing & Community Development
9.1%$166.3M
Interest on Debt
8.6%$158.4M
Utilities
5.6%$102.6M
Police
4.7%$86.3M
Fire Protection
3.1%$56.8M
Parks & Recreation
2.1%$38.0M
Highways & Roads
1.6%$28.8M
Hospitals
0.0%$292K

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Intergovernmental
72.5%$750.8M
Other
16.7%$173.1M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police$1,177/person
Fire Protection$774/person
Highways & Roads$392/person
Parks & Recreation$518/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)29/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)18/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Kalamazoo stacks up against another city.

vs Detroit, MIvs Grand Rapids, MIvs Warren, MI
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Michigan

Frequently Asked Questions

Kalamazoo, MI spends $25,034 per resident, based on total expenditures of $1.8B for a population of 73,342. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of C (50/100).

Kalamazoo, MI has total expenditures of $1.8B and total revenue of $1.0B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Kalamazoo, MI employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Kalamazoo, MI has a Fiscal Health Score of C (50/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.