Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Jupiter, FL

Population: 60,926 (2022) · Small Cities (50K–100K)

C
54/100

Average fiscal health — some areas of concern

Total Spending
$933.4M
Per Capita
$15,320
Total Revenue
$200.6M
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Utilities
29.1%$271.2M
Housing & Community Development
26.1%$243.6M
Sewerage
12.7%$118.6M
Fire Protection
10.6%$99.3M
Public Welfare
9.0%$83.7M
Other
8.9%$83.4M
Parks & Recreation
3.6%$33.6M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Property Tax
0.7%$1.3M
Sales Tax
3.6%$7.1M
Income Tax
25.9%$52.0M
Intergovernmental
100.0%$200.6M
Charges & Fees
142.9%$286.7M
Other
16.6%$33.4M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection$1,630/person
Parks & Recreation$551/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)7/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)81/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Jupiter stacks up against another city.

vs Jacksonville, FLvs Miami, FLvs Tampa, FL
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Florida

Frequently Asked Questions

Jupiter, FL spends $15,320 per resident, based on total expenditures of $933.4M for a population of 60,926. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of C (54/100).

Jupiter, FL has total expenditures of $933.4M and total revenue of $200.6M. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Jupiter, FL employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Jupiter, FL has a Fiscal Health Score of C (54/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.