Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Franklin, TN

Population: 83,630 (2022) · Small Cities (50K-100K)

A
86/100

Excellent fiscal health, strong reserves, low debt, well-funded pensions

Total Spending
$1.2B
Per Capita
$14,081
Total Revenue
$1.4B
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
26.2%$308.9M
Housing & Community Development
18.9%$222.4M
Utilities
18.5%$217.3M
Public Welfare
12.2%$143.4M
Fire Protection
8.7%$102.1M
Hospitals
7.3%$85.8M
Parks & Recreation
5.4%$63.2M
Interest on Debt
2.9%$34.4M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Sales Tax
0.1%$1.5M
Income Tax
7.7%$109.1M
Intergovernmental
5.2%$72.7M
Charges & Fees
10.4%$147.1M
Other
19.0%$268.0M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection$1,221/person
Parks & Recreation$755/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)89/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)89/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)100/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Franklin stacks up against another city.

vs Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TNvs Memphis, TNvs Knoxville, TN
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Tennessee

Frequently Asked Questions

Franklin, TN spends $14,081 per resident, based on total expenditures of $1.2B for a population of 83,630. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of A (86/100).

Franklin, TN has total expenditures of $1.2B and total revenue of $1.4B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Franklin, TN employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Franklin, TN has a Fiscal Health Score of A (86/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.

this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. municipal and county government finances dataset. The detail above comes directly from the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. cities, counties, and states.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. cities, counties, and states. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.