Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Apopka, FL

Population: 55,056 (2022) · Small Cities (50K–100K)

B
65/100

Good fiscal health — above-average across most metrics

Total Spending
$720.9M
Per Capita
$13,093
Total Revenue
$689.0M
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
38.0%$273.9M
Housing & Community Development
21.9%$158.1M
Fire Protection
14.3%$102.7M
Utilities
13.2%$95.2M
Parks & Recreation
6.1%$43.8M
Public Welfare
5.0%$36.3M
Sewerage
1.5%$10.8M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Property Tax
0.4%$2.6M
Sales Tax
1.0%$7.2M
Income Tax
7.6%$52.2M
Intergovernmental
100.0%$689.0M
Charges & Fees
19.3%$133.3M
Other
18.1%$124.8M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection$1,866/person
Parks & Recreation$796/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)41/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)95/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Apopka stacks up against another city.

vs Jacksonville, FLvs Miami, FLvs Tampa, FL
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Florida

Frequently Asked Questions

Apopka, FL spends $13,093 per resident, based on total expenditures of $720.9M for a population of 55,056. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of B (65/100).

Apopka, FL has total expenditures of $720.9M and total revenue of $689.0M. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Apopka, FL employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Apopka, FL has a Fiscal Health Score of B (65/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.